Greenhouse vs Lever
The pair most often shortlisted when a company outgrows its first tracker.
The result
- GreenhouseTransparency 35/100 EBand ERank 8 of 14 in Applicant tracking
- LeverTransparency 43/100 DBand DRank 7 of 14 in Applicant tracking
4 differences out of 10 criteria we could measure for both, last measured 2026-09-02. They match on 6 of the 10 criteria we could measure for both.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. This page compares what these two vendors publish, not what their products do.
Where they differ
| Criterion | What we found |
|---|---|
| Subprocessor list | We found it for Lever (source). For Greenhouse we checked 7 addresses and found none. |
| Data location stated | We found it for Greenhouse (source). For Lever we checked 7 addresses and found none. |
| HTTPS enforced with HSTS | We found it for Lever (source). For Greenhouse we checked 2 addresses and found none. |
| security.txt (RFC 9116) | We found it for Greenhouse (source). For Lever we checked 1 address and found none. |
Where they match
Found for both, each with its source on the vendor page:
Found for neither at the addresses we checked (8 for Greenhouse, 8 for Lever on the first of them). That is what we found, not a statement about what either vendor has.
- Data processing agreement
- Public pricing
- Uptime SLA with a figure
- No third-party tracking before consent
Measured for only one of the two
2 criteria could be measured for only one of the two, so they are left out of the comparison entirely. That is a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor.
- Notice before subprocessors change not measured for Greenhouse
- Named privacy contact not measured for Greenhouse
The full labels
Every criterion with its weight, and the band each vendor lands in. Every line links the page we found it on; a cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked.
Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com
Greenhouse
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
Published commitments3 of 7 found, 2 not measured
- not foundData processing agreement×3
- not foundSubprocessor list×3
- foundData location stated×3
- foundStatus page with history×2
- not foundPublic pricing×2
- not measuredNotice before subprocessors change×2
- foundCertifications named×1
- not foundUptime SLA with a figure×1
- not measuredNamed privacy contact×1
Measured behaviour1 of 3 found
- not foundHTTPS enforced with HSTS×2
- not foundNo third-party tracking before consent×2
- foundsecurity.txt (RFC 9116)×1
Checked 2026-08-31. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.
Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com
Lever
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
Published commitments4 of 9 found
- not foundData processing agreement×3
- foundSubprocessor list×3
- not foundData location stated×3
- foundStatus page with history×2
- not foundPublic pricing×2
- foundNotice before subprocessors change×2
- foundCertifications named×1
- not foundUptime SLA with a figure×1
- not foundNamed privacy contact×1
Measured behaviour1 of 3 found
- foundHTTPS enforced with HSTS×2
- not foundNo third-party tracking before consent×2
- not foundsecurity.txt (RFC 9116)×1
Checked 2026-09-02. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.
Keep going
The order of the two names is the order of our editorial list. It is not a ranking, and no vendor pays to appear here or to appear first. See how we measure.