SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CoreFiling

Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CoreFiling does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 48 that differ from CoreFiling on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CoreFiling has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CoreFiling does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CoreFiling does notCoreFiling publishes, and they do not
Secureframesecureframe.com 83/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Keelkeelgrc.com 78/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Bitsightbitsight.com 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Vantavanta.com 57/100 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 nothing Compare
Whisticwhistic.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
LogicGatelogicgate.com 55/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
UpGuardupguard.com 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Hyperproofhyperproof.io 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Certacerta.ai 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Optrooptro.ai 30/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cypagocypago.com 26/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Trusterotrustero.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.