SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to UDA Technologies

Other Construction estimating vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that UDA Technologies does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from UDA Technologies on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

UDA Technologies has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and UDA Technologies does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and UDA Technologies does notUDA Technologies publishes, and they do not
HCSShcss.com 45/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Countfirecountfire.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
STACKstackct.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Kabandykabandy.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
RSMeansrsmeans.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Drawer AIdrawer.ai 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Buildxactbuildxact.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ConstructConnectconstructconnect.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Knowifyknowify.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Togal.AItogal.ai 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cubitbuildsoft.com.au 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Joistjoist.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.