SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CIPPlanner

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CIPPlanner does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 58 that differ from CIPPlanner on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CIPPlanner has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CIPPlanner does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CIPPlanner does notCIPPlanner publishes, and they do not
Daluxdalux.com 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
CompanyCamcompanycam.com 48/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Nexvianexvia.com.au 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.de 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Bluebeambluebeam.com 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Procoreprocore.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
SmartPMsmartpmtech.com 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Newformanewforma.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
O3 Solutionso3.solutions 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
RIB Softwarerib-software.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
PlanRadarplanradar.com 25/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.