Alternatives to Kyverno
Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kyverno does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 14 that differ from Kyverno on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kyverno has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kyverno does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Kyverno does not | Kyverno publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socketsocket.dev | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Upwindupwind.io | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Docker Scoutdocker.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Endor Labsendorlabs.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Chainguardchainguard.dev | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Anchoreanchore.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Nirmatanirmata.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Sweet Securitysweet.security | 17/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Cast AIcast.ai | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Isovalentisovalent.com | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Armoarmosec.io | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.