SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Tetragon

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tetragon does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Tetragon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tetragon has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tetragon does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tetragon does notTetragon publishes, and they do not
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zestyzesty.co 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 nothing Compare
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Upwindupwind.io 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tigeratigera.io 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Sedaisedai.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Spectro Cloudspectrocloud.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
vClustervcluster.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Chainguardchainguard.dev 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.