SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Enonic

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Enonic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from Enonic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Enonic has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Enonic does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Enonic does notEnonic publishes, and they do not
Sanitysanity.io 78/100 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
Storyblokstoryblok.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Contentstackcontentstack.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Directusdirectus.io 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Pantheonpantheon.io 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Craft CMScraftcms.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Shorthandshorthand.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Uniformuniform.dev 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Strapistrapi.io 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
CloudCannoncloudcannon.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Prismicprismic.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
ButterCMSbuttercms.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.