SaaS transparency ranking · Content, media and collaboration
Content management systems vendors, ranked by what they publish
Headless and traditional CMS platforms, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
10 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 9 ranked, 1 without enough data for a score. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.
- Content management systems26
- All categories26
10 vendors
Sort by Score Name Last checked
Filters (0)
- ✓ found, source linked
- × not found at the addresses we checked
- – not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
1
Contentstackcontentstack.comTransparency 48/100 DBand D
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 6 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 48/100 = weight of what we found (11) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 1 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 5 criteria: Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 7 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
2
ButterCMSbuttercms.comTransparency 30/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 7 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 30/100 = weight of what we found (7) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 2 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 4 criteria: Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Certifications named ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
3
Progress Sitefinityprogress.comTransparency 30/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 7 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 30/100 = weight of what we found (7) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 3 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 4 criteria: Data location stated ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Certifications named ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
4
CoreMediacoremedia.comTransparency 26/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 8 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 26/100 = weight of what we found (6) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 4 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Data location stated ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 9 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
5
TYPO3typo3.comTransparency 26/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 8 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 26/100 = weight of what we found (6) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 5 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Data location stated ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 9 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
6
Builder.iobuilder.ioTransparency 23/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 7 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 23/100 = weight of what we found (5) divided by weight of what we could measure (22). Rank 6 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1.
Not measured by us, 1 criterion: security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
7
Cockpitgetcockpit.comTransparency 22/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 9 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 22/100 = weight of what we found (5) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 7 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 2 criteria: Data location stated ×3, No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 10 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
8
Concrete CMSconcretecms.comTransparency 9/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 10 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 9/100 = weight of what we found (2) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 8 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 11 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
9
Gravgetgrav.orgTransparency 9/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 9 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 9/100 = weight of what we found (2) divided by weight of what we could measure (22). Rank 9 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 10 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not measured by us, 1 criterion: security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
Contentfulcontentful.comNot enough data: 4 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not measured
- Subprocessor list: not measured
- Data location stated: not measured
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: HTTPS enforced with HSTS and 1 moreWhy this rank?
No score: we could measure 4 of 12 criteria, and below 9 there is no number and no rank. That is a statement about our measurement, not about the vendor.
Found with a source, 2 criteria: Status page with history ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 2 criteria: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Certifications named ×1.
Not measured by us, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Public pricing ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
Tick two vendors above.
This category, criterion by criterion
How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.
- Data processing agreement
- Subprocessor list
- Data location stated
- Status page with history
- Public pricing
- Certifications named
- Uptime SLA with a figure
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- No third-party tracking before consent
- Notice before subprocessors change
- Named privacy contact
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.