SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Legartis

Other Contract management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Legartis does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Legartis on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Legartis has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Legartis does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Legartis does notLegartis publishes, and they do not
Ironcladironcladapp.com 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Congaconga.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Jurojuro.com 40/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gatekeepergatekeeperhq.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Contractbookcontractbook.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Agiloftagiloft.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Outlawgetoutlaw.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
DocJurisdocjuris.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Lexionlexion.ai 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
LinkSquareslinksquares.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
fynkfynk.com 25/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Summizesummize.com 20/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.