Alternatives to eFileTexas
Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that eFileTexas does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 10 that differ from eFileTexas on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
eFileTexas has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and eFileTexas does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and eFileTexas does not | eFileTexas publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Legalonelegal.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| equivantequivant.com | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Conduent Courtsconduent.com | 10/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| CourtCallcourtcall.com | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Jano Technologiesjanotech.com | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Journal Technologiesjournaltech.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Netsentialnetsential.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.com | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| For The Recordfortherecord.com | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Kofilekofile.com | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Cardinal Courtcardinaltracking.com | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
| JAVSjavs.com | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.