Transparency alternatives to Marker.io
Other Creative review and approval vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Marker.io. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Marker.io on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Marker.io has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Marker.io” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Marker.io | Found at Marker.io, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balsamiqbalsamiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Balsamiq | 91/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Atarimatarim.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Atarim | 48/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Marvelmarvelapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Marvel | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Ziflowziflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ziflow | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Frame.ioframe.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frame.io | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Pageproofpageproof.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pageproof | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Wipsterwipster.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Wipster | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Wireframe.ccwireframe.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Wireframe.cc | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Markup.iomarkup.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Markup.io | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Relumerelume.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Relume | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Abstractabstract.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abstract | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Sketchsketch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sketch | 74/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.