Alternatives to Atarim
Other Creative review and approval vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Atarim does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Atarim on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Atarim has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Atarim does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Atarim does not | Atarim publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balsamiqbalsamiq.com | 77/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Marker.iomarker.io | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bugherdbugherd.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Approval Studioapproval.studio | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Axureaxure.com | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Flowmappflowmapp.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Frame.ioframe.io | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Moqupsmoqups.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Overflowoverflow.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Volleyvolleyapp.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Notismnotism.io | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Ashoreashoreapp.com | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.