Certifications named in Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics
Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.
12 of 33 companies we measured here publish it, that is 36%. Last checked 2026-10-17.
36% here against 24% across every category we measure. Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics.
- Found12
- Not found at checked addresses21
- Not measured0
33 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.
Published
SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| 21 Analytics | https://www.21analytics.co/trust/Checked |
| Bitwave | https://www.bitwave.io/securityChecked |
| CoinTracking | https://cointracking.info/securityChecked |
| Elliptic | https://www.elliptic.co/trust/Checked |
| Integral | https://integral.xyz/securityChecked |
| Ledgible | https://ledgible.io/trust-center/Checked |
| Lukka | https://lukka.tech/trust-center/Checked |
| Node40 | https://node40.com/securityChecked |
| Notabene | https://notabene.id/securityChecked |
| Request Finance | https://www.requestfinance.com/Checked |
| TaxBit | https://trust.taxbit.com/Checked |
| TRM Labs | https://www.trmlabs.com/compliance-centerChecked |
No named certification found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Accointing | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| AnChain.AI | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Arkham | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Bitquery | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockaid | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockchain Intelligence Group | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockpit | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Chainalysis | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| CoinLedger | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cryptio | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Crystal Intelligence | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Forta | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Global Ledger | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Koinly | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Merkle Science | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Nansen | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Scorechain | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Shyft Network | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Solidus Labs | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Tres Finance | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
| Uppsala Security | 6 addresses checkedChecked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Other criteria in Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics
- Data processing agreement
- Data location stated
- Status page with history
- Public pricing
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- No third-party tracking before consent
- security.txt (RFC 9116)
- Named privacy contact
Certifications named in related categories
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.