Status page with history in Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics
A status page without past incidents tells you nothing about reliability.
7 of 33 companies we measured here publish it, that is 21%. Last checked 2026-10-17.
21% here against 17% across every category we measure. Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Status page with history across all categories, or to Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics.
- Found7
- Not found at checked addresses26
- Not measured0
33 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.
Published
A public status page with incident history.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Bitwave | https://status.bitwave.io/Checked |
| Chainalysis | https://status.chainalysis.com/Checked |
| CoinLedger | https://status.coinledger.io/Checked |
| Crystal Intelligence | https://status.crystalintelligence.com/Checked |
| Scorechain | https://status.scorechain.com/Checked |
| Tres Finance | https://status.tres.finance/Checked |
| TRM Labs | https://status.trmlabs.com/Checked |
No public status page found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| 21 Analytics | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Accointing | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| AnChain.AI | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Arkham | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Bitquery | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockaid | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockchain Intelligence Group | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blockpit | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| CoinTracking | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cryptio | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Elliptic | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Forta | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Global Ledger | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Integral | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Koinly | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Ledgible | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Lukka | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Merkle Science | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Nansen | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Node40 | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Notabene | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Request Finance | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Shyft Network | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Solidus Labs | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| TaxBit | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Uppsala Security | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Other criteria in Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics
- Data processing agreement
- Data location stated
- Public pricing
- Certifications named
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- No third-party tracking before consent
- security.txt (RFC 9116)
- Named privacy contact
Status page with history in related categories
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.