SaaS Ranking

Data processing agreement in User research and testing

Without a published DPA you cannot review the contract before you talk to sales.

6 of 37 companies we measured here publish it, that is 16%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

16% here against 11% across every category we measure. User research and testing sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Data processing agreement across all categories, or to User research and testing.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found6
  • Not found at checked addresses31
  • Not measured0

37 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Published and readable without a login.

VendorWhat we found
Attention Insight https://attentioninsight.com/data-processing-agreement/Checked
Loop11 https://www.loop11.com/data-processing-agreement/Checked
Sprig https://sprig.com/dpaChecked
User Interviews https://www.userinterviews.com/legal/data-processing-agreementChecked
UserTesting https://www.usertesting.com/privacy-center/data-processing-agreementChecked
UXtweak https://www.uxtweak.com/legal/gdpr-compliance/Checked
No data processing agreement found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aurelius 8 addresses checkedChecked
Ballpark 8 addresses checkedChecked
Condens 8 addresses checkedChecked
Dovetail 8 addresses checkedChecked
dscout 8 addresses checkedChecked
EyeQuestion 8 addresses checkedChecked
Grain 8 addresses checkedChecked
Great Question 8 addresses checkedChecked
Helio 8 addresses checkedChecked
Hubble 8 addresses checkedChecked
Lookback 8 addresses checkedChecked
Looppanel 8 addresses checkedChecked
Lyssna 8 addresses checkedChecked
Marvin 8 addresses checkedChecked
Maze 8 addresses checkedChecked
Optimal Workshop 8 addresses checkedChecked
PlaybookUX 8 addresses checkedChecked
Preely 8 addresses checkedChecked
Prolific 8 addresses checkedChecked
Qatalyst 8 addresses checkedChecked
Quirkos 8 addresses checkedChecked
Rally 8 addresses checkedChecked
Reduct 8 addresses checkedChecked
Respondent 8 addresses checkedChecked
Testapic 8 addresses checkedChecked
Trymata 8 addresses checkedChecked
Useberry 8 addresses checkedChecked
Userbrain 8 addresses checkedChecked
Userlytics 8 addresses checkedChecked
UXArmy 8 addresses checkedChecked
Wevo 8 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Other criteria in User research and testing

Data processing agreement in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.