Public pricing in Background screening
Hidden pricing moves the first comparison into a sales call.
4 of 13 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 31%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
31% here against 45% across every category we measure. Background screening sits below the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Public pricing across all categories, or to Background screening.
Published
Actual numbers on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Certn | https://certn.co/pricing/ |
| Checkr | https://checkr.com/pricing |
| Verified First | https://verifiedfirst.com/pricing/ |
| Xref | https://www.xref.com/pricing |
No public pricing with figures found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Accurate Background | 5 addresses checked |
| Asurint | 5 addresses checked |
| AuthBridge | 5 addresses checked |
| Barada Associates | 5 addresses checked |
| Choice Screening | 5 addresses checked |
| Cisive | 5 addresses checked |
| ClearStar | 5 addresses checked |
| InfoMart | 5 addresses checked |
| Truework | 5 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.