SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Push and realtime messaging

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

2 of 10 companies we measured here publish it, that is 20%. Last checked 2026-10-22.

20% here against 11% across every category we measure. Push and realtime messaging sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Push and realtime messaging.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found2
  • Not found at checked addresses8
  • Not measured0

10 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Pusher https://pusher.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Pushover https://pushover.net/.well-known/security.txtChecked
No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Catapush 1 address checkedChecked
ntfy 1 address checkedChecked
PushAlert 1 address checkedChecked
PushEngage 1 address checkedChecked
Pushsafer 1 address checkedChecked
TrueDialog 1 address checkedChecked
Webpushr 1 address checkedChecked
WonderPush 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Other criteria in Push and realtime messaging

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.