Status page with history in Workflow automation
A status page without past incidents tells you nothing about reliability.
- 14Published
- 30Vendors measured
- 47%Of those measured
- 2026-08-31Checked
47% here against 49% across every category we measure. Workflow automation sits below the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Status page with history across all categories, or to Workflow automation.
Published
A public status page with incident history.
No public status page found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Activepieces | 3 addresses checked |
| Alloy Automation | 3 addresses checked |
| Automation Anywhere | 3 addresses checked |
| Bardeen | 3 addresses checked |
| Camunda | 3 addresses checked |
| Cyclr | 3 addresses checked |
| Integrately | 3 addresses checked |
| Jitterbit | 3 addresses checked |
| Kissflow | 3 addresses checked |
| MuleSoft | 3 addresses checked |
| n8n | 3 addresses checked |
| Nintex | 3 addresses checked |
| Pabbly | 3 addresses checked |
| SnapLogic | 3 addresses checked |
| Tallyfy | 3 addresses checked |
| UiPath | 3 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.