SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Workflow automation

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

18% here against 23% across every category we measure. Workflow automation sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Workflow automation.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
n8n https://n8n.io/.well-known/security.txt
Nango https://nango.dev/.well-known/security.txt
Prismatic https://prismatic.io/.well-known/security.txt
Tallyfy https://tallyfy.com/.well-known/security.txt
UiPath https://www.uipath.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Activepieces 1 address checked
Alloy Automation 1 address checked
Automation Anywhere 1 address checked
Bardeen 1 address checked
Boomi 1 address checked
Camunda 1 address checked
Celigo 1 address checked
Cyclr 1 address checked
IFTTT 1 address checked
Integrately 1 address checked
Jitterbit 1 address checked
Kissflow 1 address checked
Make 1 address checked
Merge 1 address checked
Nintex 1 address checked
Pabbly 1 address checked
Paragon 1 address checked
Pipedream 1 address checked
Process Street 1 address checked
SnapLogic 1 address checked
Tray.ai 1 address checked
Workato 1 address checked
Zapier 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
MuleSoft The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.
Pipefy The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.