Status page with history in Vulnerability management
A status page without past incidents tells you nothing about reliability.
16 of 42 companies we measured here publish it, that is 38%. Last checked 2026-10-17.
38% here against 17% across every category we measure. Vulnerability management sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Status page with history across all categories, or to Vulnerability management.
- Found16
- Not found at checked addresses26
- Not measured1
43 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.
Published
A public status page with incident history.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Aqua Security | https://status.aquasec.com/Checked |
| Black Duck | https://status.blackduck.com/Checked |
| Cycode | https://status.cycode.com/Checked |
| Holm Security | https://status.holmsecurity.com/Checked |
| Mend | https://status.mend.io/Checked |
| Nucleus Security | https://status.nucleussec.com/Checked |
| Probely | https://status.probely.com/Checked |
| Qualys | https://status.qualys.com/Checked |
| Rapid7 | https://status.rapid7.com/Checked |
| Semgrep | https://status.semgrep.dev/Checked |
| Snyk | https://status.snyk.io/Checked |
| StackHawk | https://status.stackhawk.com/Checked |
| Sucuri | https://status.sucuri.net/Checked |
| Tenable | https://status.tenable.com/Checked |
| Veracode | https://status.veracode.com/Checked |
| Wiz | https://status.wiz.io/Checked |
No public status page found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Arnica | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Bright Security | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Brinqa | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Bugcrowd | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Checkmarx | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cobalt | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Detectify | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Edgescan | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Greenbone | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| HackerOne | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Intigriti | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Intruder | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Invicti | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| JFrog | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Legit Security | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Orca Security | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Outpost24 | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Ox Security | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Patchstack | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Pentera | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Reflectiz | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| SonarSource | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Sysdig | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| Vicarius | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
| YesWeHack | 3 addresses checkedChecked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Cymulate | This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it.Checked |
Other criteria in Vulnerability management
- Data processing agreement
- Subprocessor list
- Data location stated
- Public pricing
- Certifications named
- Uptime SLA with a figure
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- security.txt (RFC 9116)
- Notice before subprocessors change
- Named privacy contact
Status page with history in related categories
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.