SaaS Ranking

Subprocessor list in Data integration

Naming the actual subprocessors is what turns a privacy promise into something you can check.

20% here against 16% across every category we measure. Data integration sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Subprocessor list across all categories, or to Data integration.

Published

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

VendorWhat we found
Estuary https://estuary.dev/legal/subprocessors
Hightouch https://hightouch.com/subprocessors
Prefect https://www.prefect.io/sub-processors
Segment https://www.twilio.com/en-us/legal/sub-processors
Snowplow https://snowplow.io/subprocessors
Striim https://www.striim.com/legal/subprocessors/

No subprocessor list found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Airbyte 7 addresses checked
Astronomer 7 addresses checked
Confluent 7 addresses checked
Dagster 7 addresses checked
Datafold 7 addresses checked
dbt Labs 7 addresses checked
Fivetran 7 addresses checked
Hevo Data 7 addresses checked
Informatica 7 addresses checked
Integrate.io 7 addresses checked
Keboola 7 addresses checked
Matillion 7 addresses checked
Meltano 7 addresses checked
Nexla 7 addresses checked
Polytomic 7 addresses checked
Portable 7 addresses checked
Redpanda 7 addresses checked
Rivery 7 addresses checked
RudderStack 7 addresses checked
Stitch 7 addresses checked
StreamSets 7 addresses checked
Talend 7 addresses checked
Weld 7 addresses checked
Y42 7 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.