Data integration vendors, ranked by transparency
ETL and data pipeline tools, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
- 30Vendors
- 30Ranked
- 12Criteria each
- 2026-08-31Checked
| # | Vendor | Score | DPA | Subproc. | Region | Status | Pricing | Certs | SLA | HSTS | Consent | sec.txt | Notice | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estuary | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 2 | Prefect | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 3 | Weld | 65 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 4 | Keboola | 60 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 5 | Redpanda | 60 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 6 | Segment | 60 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 7 | Striim | 58 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | – | – | – |
| 8 | Astronomer | 55 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 9 | Hevo Data | 55 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 10 | Hightouch | 55 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 11 | Matillion | 55 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 12 | Polytomic | 50 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 13 | Snowplow | 45 | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 14 | Integrate.io | 44 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 15 | Confluent | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 16 | Y42 | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 17 | dbt Labs | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 18 | Portable | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | – | – |
| 19 | Rivery | 35 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 20 | RudderStack | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 21 | Stitch | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 22 | Airbyte | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 23 | Datafold | 30 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 24 | Dagster | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 25 | Fivetran | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 26 | Meltano | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 27 | Informatica | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 28 | StreamSets | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 29 | Talend | 15 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 30 | Nexla | 5 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
This category, criterion by criterion
How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.
Data processing agreement · Subprocessor list · Data location stated · Status page with history · Public pricing · Certifications named · Uptime SLA with a figure · HTTPS enforced with HSTS · No third-party tracking before consent · security.txt (RFC 9116)
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.