SaaS Ranking

Notice before subprocessors change in Endpoint management and security

A list is a snapshot. Art. 28(2) GDPR gives you a right to object, and that needs advance notice.

8 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 21%. Last checked 2026-10-19.

21% here against 10% across every category we measure. Endpoint management and security sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Notice before subprocessors change across all categories, or to Endpoint management and security.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found8
  • Not found at checked addresses31
  • Not measured3

42 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

VendorWhat we found
Action1 https://www.action1.com/data-processing-agreement/Checked
Addigy https://addigy.com/legal/dpa/Checked
Esper https://www.esper.io/dpaChecked
Hexnode https://www.hexnode.com/legal/dpa/Checked
Kaseya https://www.kaseya.com/legal/subprocessors/Checked
Level https://level.io/legal/subprocessorsChecked
Malwarebytes https://www.malwarebytes.com/legal/dpaChecked
SentinelOne https://www.sentinelone.com/legal/Checked
No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
42Gears 8 addresses checkedChecked
AirDroid Business 8 addresses checkedChecked
Applivery 8 addresses checkedChecked
Apptimized 8 addresses checkedChecked
Automox 8 addresses checkedChecked
baramundi 8 addresses checkedChecked
CapaSystems 8 addresses checkedChecked
Codeproof 8 addresses checkedChecked
CrowdStrike 8 addresses checkedChecked
Datto 8 addresses checkedChecked
Eido 8 addresses checkedChecked
ESET 8 addresses checkedChecked
Faronics 8 addresses checkedChecked
Fleet 8 addresses checkedChecked
Iru 8 addresses checkedChecked
Jamf 8 addresses checkedChecked
Menlo Security 8 addresses checkedChecked
Miradore 8 addresses checkedChecked
Moki 8 addresses checkedChecked
Mosyle 8 addresses checkedChecked
NinjaOne 8 addresses checkedChecked
Numiato 8 addresses checkedChecked
PDQ Connect 8 addresses checkedChecked
Scalefusion 8 addresses checkedChecked
Senso 8 addresses checkedChecked
SimpleMDM 8 addresses checkedChecked
Sophos 8 addresses checkedChecked
Stratodesk NoTouch Cloud 8 addresses checkedChecked
Swif 8 addresses checkedChecked
Syncro 8 addresses checkedChecked
Trustonic 8 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Atera The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Bitdefender The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Pulseway The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Endpoint management and security

Notice before subprocessors change in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.