SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pipedrive

Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pipedrive does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Pipedrive on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pipedrive has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Pipedrive does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pipedrive does notPipedrive publishes, and they do not
Capsulecapsulecrm.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Nutshellnutshell.com 65/100 1 Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Insightlyinsightly.com 60/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Teamleaderteamleader.eu 59/100 1 Status page with history 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
HubSpothubspot.com 55/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list Compare
Coppercopper.com 45/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Vtigervtiger.com 43/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Freshworksfreshworks.com 39/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Weclappweclapp.com 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Closeclose.com 25/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Zoho CRMzoho.com 25/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
EspoCRMespocrm.com 65/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.