SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Accointing

Other Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Accointing does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Accointing on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Accointing has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Accointing does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Accointing does notAccointing publishes, and they do not
TaxBittaxbit.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
21 Analytics21analytics.co 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
CoinTrackingcointracking.info 39/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Notabenenotabene.id 39/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Chainalysischainalysis.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Scorechainscorechain.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Ellipticelliptic.co 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Bitwavebitwave.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Blockpitblockpit.io 35/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
CoinLedgercoinledger.io 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Integralintegral.xyz 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Ledgibleledgible.io 22/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.