SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Bitwave

Other Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Bitwave does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Bitwave on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Bitwave has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Bitwave does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Bitwave does notBitwave publishes, and they do not
TaxBittaxbit.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
CoinTrackingcointracking.info 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Notabenenotabene.id 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Blockpitblockpit.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Chainalysischainalysis.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Scorechainscorechain.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Accointingaccointing.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Ellipticelliptic.co 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
21 Analytics21analytics.co 22/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Bitquerybitquery.io 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Arkhamarkhamintelligence.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
CoinLedgercoinledger.io 26/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.