SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Request Finance

Other Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Request Finance. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Request Finance on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Request Finance has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Request Finance” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Request FinanceFound at Request Finance, not found there
Scorechainscorechain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scorechain 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Crystal Intelligencecrystalintelligence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crystal Intelligence 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
CoinTrackingcointracking.infoSee also Transparency alternatives to CoinTracking 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Notabenenotabene.idSee also Transparency alternatives to Notabene 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Blockpitblockpit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Blockpit 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Ellipticelliptic.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Elliptic 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
TaxBittaxbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TaxBit 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Chainalysischainalysis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chainalysis 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
21 Analytics21analytics.coSee also Transparency alternatives to 21 Analytics 13/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tres Financetres.financeSee also Transparency alternatives to Tres Finance 13/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
CoinLedgercoinledger.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoinLedger 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Bitwavebitwave.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Bitwave 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.