SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Estuary

Other Data integration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Estuary does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Estuary on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Estuary has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Estuary does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Estuary does notEstuary publishes, and they do not
Keboolakeboola.com 65/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Striimstriim.com 58/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Segmentsegment.com 57/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hevo Datahevodata.com 55/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list Compare
Astronomerastronomer.io 52/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Redpandaredpanda.com 52/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Confluentconfluent.io 40/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Y42y42.com 40/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Informaticainformatica.com 20/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Prefectprefect.io 80/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Weldweld.app 57/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Hightouchhightouch.com 55/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.