SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to TaskUs

Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TaskUs does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from TaskUs on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TaskUs has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and TaskUs does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and TaskUs does notTaskUs publishes, and they do not
HumanSignalhumansignal.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Datasaurdatasaur.ai 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Hivethehive.ai 43/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Dataloopdataloop.ai 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
V7v7labs.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
CVATcvat.ai 39/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Kognickognic.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Kilikili-technology.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Appenappen.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Labelboxlabelbox.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Anolyticsanolytics.ai 17/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Data location stated Compare
iMeritimerit.net 32/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.