Transparency alternatives to Visual Layer
Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Visual Layer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Visual Layer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Visual Layer has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Visual Layer does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Visual Layer does not | Visual Layer publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale AIscale.com | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| SuperAnnotatesuperannotate.com | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| V7v7labs.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hivethehive.ai | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| HumanSignalhumansignal.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Datasaurdatasaur.ai | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Roboflowroboflow.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Dataloopdataloop.ai | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Tolokatoloka.ai | 22/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Snorkelsnorkel.ai | 13/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| iMeritimerit.net | 32/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| CVATcvat.ai | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.