Transparency alternatives to GDV Dienstleistung
Other Automotive retail software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at GDV Dienstleistung. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from GDV Dienstleistung on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
GDV Dienstleistung has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at GDV Dienstleistung” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at GDV Dienstleistung | Found at GDV Dienstleistung, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tekiontekion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tekion | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TecAlliancetecalliance.netSee also Transparency alternatives to TecAlliance | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Infomediainfomedia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Infomedia | 36/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Navigator DMSdmsnavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navigator DMS | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Autovoltautovolt.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Autovolt | 27/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| DealersClouddealerscloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DealersCloud | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DealerCenterdealercenter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DealerCenter | 18/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CDK Globalcdkglobal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CDK Global | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Loco Softloco-soft.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Loco Soft | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vinsolutionsvinsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vinsolutions | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Alldataalldata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alldata | 13/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Autodataautodata-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Autodata | 13/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.