SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to John Galt

Other Demand planning vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that John Galt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from John Galt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

John Galt has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and John Galt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and John Galt does notJohn Galt publishes, and they do not
RELEXrelexsolutions.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Slimstockslimstock.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Kinaxiskinaxis.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Peakpeak.ai 26/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
o9 Solutionso9solutions.com 30/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Flieberflieber.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Onebeatonebeat.co 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Intuendiintuendi.com 13/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Netstocknetstock.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Inventory Plannerinventory-planner.com 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Lokadlokad.com 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Cogsycogsy.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.