Alternatives to Dagger
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Dagger does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Dagger on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dagger has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Dagger does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Dagger does not | Dagger publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 74/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Aviatoraviator.co | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Depotdepot.dev | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codebergcodeberg.org | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GitLabgitlab.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.com | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Buddybuddy.works | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codeclimatecodeclimate.com | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.