SaaS Ranking
Menu

SaaS transparency ranking · Engineering and data

Developer collaboration and CI software

59 vendors · updated 2026-10-17 · 4 without enough data for a score

Code hosting and continuous integration, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.

+5points above the median of every category we measure

  • Developer collaboration and CI22
  • All categories17
Median transparency score, out of 100. Developer collaboration and CI sits above the median across every category we measure.
  1. A0 0%
  2. B3 5%
  3. C4 7%
  4. D3 5%
  5. E14 25%
  6. F31 56%
55 vendors with a score; 4 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.
All filters
Show only vendors where we found

Transparency band

4 without enough data for a band

59 vendors

Sort by

Not in the ranking

We could not measure these products with our method, so they are listed here instead of being scored. This says something about our method, not about the vendor.

Narrow it down

Each of these lists the Developer collaboration and CI vendors that meet one condition, with the source for each, and appears only where at least 8 of them meet it.

Shared dependencies

5 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Amazon Web Services on it, that is 63 %.

Of the 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read, these names appear on the most of them. A vendor without a published list cannot be missing from one, so it is not in the denominator.

Named on the list ofVendorsShareWhat that says
Amazon Web Services 5 63 % 5 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Amazon Web Services on it.
Stripe 5 63 % 5 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Stripe on it.
Sentry 4 50 % 4 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Sentry on it.
HubSpot 3 38 % 3 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name HubSpot on it.
Microsoft Azure 3 38 % 3 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Microsoft Azure on it.
Slack 3 38 % 3 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Slack on it.
Twilio 3 38 % 3 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Twilio on it.
Cloudflare 2 25 % 2 of 8 Developer collaboration and CI vendors whose subprocessor list we could read name Cloudflare on it.

This is a naming, not a dependency. A name on a subprocessor list means the vendor published it there. Whether anything actually runs on it, how much of it, and what the fallback is, is on none of these pages. What the figure does show is concentration: if three of your four candidates name the same provider, you have one path and not four.

This category, criterion by criterion

How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.

Every result links its source on the vendor page. A grey segment means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.