SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to FileFlow

Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FileFlow does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from FileFlow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FileFlow has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and FileFlow does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FileFlow does notFileFlow publishes, and they do not
Cloudinarycloudinary.com 64/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Frontifyfrontify.com 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Imgiximgix.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Massetgetmasset.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sitecore Content Hubsitecore.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Aprimoaprimo.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Uploadcareuploadcare.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Brandfolderbrandfolder.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Bynderbynder.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Airair.inc 36/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Pic-Timepic-time.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Censharecenshare.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.