Transparency alternatives to YUMPU Publishing
Other Digital publishing and flipbooks vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at YUMPU Publishing. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
5 shown of 5 that differ from YUMPU Publishing on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
YUMPU Publishing has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at YUMPU Publishing” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at YUMPU Publishing | Found at YUMPU Publishing, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issuuissuu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Issuu | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Flipsnackflipsnack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flipsnack | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Brojurebrojure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brojure | 24/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Calaméocalameo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calaméo | 5/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Publiatispubliatis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Publiatis | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.