Transparency alternatives to Calaméo
Other Digital publishing and flipbooks vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Calaméo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
5 shown of 5 that differ from Calaméo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Calaméo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Calaméo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Calaméo | Found at Calaméo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flipsnackflipsnack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flipsnack | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Issuuissuu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Issuu | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Brojurebrojure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brojure | 24/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| YUMPU Publishingyumpu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YUMPU Publishing | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Publiatispubliatis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Publiatis | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.