Transparency alternatives to triio
Other Digital twins and virtual tours vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that triio does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
5 shown of 5 that differ from triio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
triio has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and triio does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and triio does not | triio publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matterportmatterport.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| ResVRresvr.com | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Yulioyulio.com | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Visoric XR Stagerxrstager.com | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| ZynQzynq360.com | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.