Transparency alternatives to DroneDeploy
Other Drone operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DroneDeploy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from DroneDeploy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DroneDeploy has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at DroneDeploy” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at DroneDeploy | Found at DroneDeploy, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propeller Aeropropelleraero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propeller Aero | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aeroboticsaerobotics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aerobotics | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Dronedeskdronedesk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Dronedesk | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Firmatekfirmatek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firmatek | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Perceptopercepto.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Percepto | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Flyabilityflyability.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flyability | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Pix4Dpix4d.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pix4D | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| FlytBaseflytbase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FlytBase | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Parrotparrot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parrot | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Delairdelair.aeroSee also Transparency alternatives to Delair | 14/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Sitemarksitemark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitemark | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Spexispexigeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spexi | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.