Transparency alternatives to Pix4D
Other Drone operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pix4D. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Pix4D on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pix4D has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pix4D” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pix4D | Found at Pix4D, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DroneDeploydronedeploy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DroneDeploy | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Propeller Aeropropelleraero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propeller Aero | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Aeroboticsaerobotics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aerobotics | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Firmatekfirmatek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firmatek | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Airdataairdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airdata | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Flyabilityflyability.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flyability | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Aloftaloft.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Aloft | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Dronedeskdronedesk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Dronedesk | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Perceptopercepto.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Percepto | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Raptor Mapsraptormaps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raptor Maps | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| FlytBaseflytbase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FlytBase | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Wingtrawingtra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wingtra | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.