SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Arist

Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Arist. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Arist on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arist has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Arist” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AristFound at Arist, not found there
Courseboxcoursebox.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Coursebox 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Immerseimmerse.onlineSee also Transparency alternatives to Immerse 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Lectoraelblearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lectora 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Ottolearnottolearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ottolearn 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Simxsimxvr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simx 26/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Easygeneratoreasygenerator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easygenerator 41/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
ClickLearnclicklearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickLearn 30/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Vectorsolutionsvectorsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorsolutions 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Dominknowdominknow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dominknow 26/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Intellumintellum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intellum 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Motive.iomotive.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Motive.io 26/100 1 Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Virtivirti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Virti 26/100 1 Status page with history 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.