Transparency alternatives to ClickLearn
Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ClickLearn does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from ClickLearn on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ClickLearn has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ClickLearn does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ClickLearn does not | ClickLearn publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aristarist.co | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Immerseimmerse.online | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lectoraelblearning.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Courseboxcoursebox.ai | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Easygeneratoreasygenerator.com | 41/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Attensiattensi.com | 22/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ottolearnottolearn.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vectorsolutionsvectorsolutions.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dominknowdominknow.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Intellumintellum.com | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Motive.iomotive.io | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| H5Ph5p.org | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.