Transparency alternatives to Ottolearn
Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ottolearn. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Ottolearn on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ottolearn has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ottolearn” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ottolearn | Found at Ottolearn, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aristarist.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arist | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Immerseimmerse.onlineSee also Transparency alternatives to Immerse | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Lectoraelblearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lectora | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Attensiattensi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Attensi | 22/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Courseboxcoursebox.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Coursebox | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Easygeneratoreasygenerator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easygenerator | 41/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| ClickLearnclicklearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickLearn | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Vectorsolutionsvectorsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorsolutions | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Intellumintellum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intellum | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Strivrstrivr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Strivr | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Dominknowdominknow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dominknow | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Motive.iomotive.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Motive.io | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.