SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Titan

Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Titan does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Titan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Titan has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Titan does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Titan does notTitan publishes, and they do not
Tutatuta.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Stalwartstalw.art 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
StartMailstartmail.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Fastmailfastmail.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Gandigandi.net 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Migadumigadu.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Grommuniogrommunio.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Yandex 360yandex.com 22/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hushmailhushmail.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
df.eudf.eu 26/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Purelymailpurelymail.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
Runboxrunbox.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.