SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Webgo

Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Webgo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from Webgo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Webgo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Webgo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Webgo does notWebgo publishes, and they do not
Tutatuta.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
StartMailstartmail.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Stalwartstalw.art 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Gandigandi.net 30/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Fastmailfastmail.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Migadumigadu.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Runboxrunbox.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Grommuniogrommunio.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Hushmailhushmail.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
df.eudf.eu 26/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Purelymailpurelymail.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
mailbox.orgmailbox.org 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.