SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Monitor ERP

Other ERP for mid-market vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Monitor ERP does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 80 that differ from Monitor ERP on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Monitor ERP has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Monitor ERP does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Monitor ERP does notMonitor ERP publishes, and they do not
Erplyerply.com 52/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Scopevisioscopevisio.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Axix Technologiesaxixtechnologies.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Frappefrappe.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
INNERGYinnergy.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Manaxomanaxo.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Business Manager Enterprisebusinessmanerp.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NutraSoftnutrasoft.ca 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cetec ERPcetecerp.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Windward Softwarewindwardsoftware.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Acumaticaacumatica.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
DataCruddatacrud.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.