SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to E-clearing

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that E-clearing does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from E-clearing on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

E-clearing has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and E-clearing does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and E-clearing does notE-clearing publishes, and they do not
Driivzdriivz.com 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Hubjecthubject.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Chargepointchargepoint.com 32/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Virtavirta.global 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Reevreev.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Atlanteatlante.energy 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Easeeeasee.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Chargecloudchargecloud.de 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ellielli.eco 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Etreletrel.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Go-ego-e.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Montamonta.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.