SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Juice

Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Juice does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Juice on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Juice has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Juice does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Juice does notJuice publishes, and they do not
Chargepointchargepoint.com 32/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Driivzdriivz.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Reevreev.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Easeeeasee.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Virtavirta.global 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Hubjecthubject.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Plugsurfingplugsurfing.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Zapteczaptec.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ellielli.eco 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Mennekesmennekes.de 14/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Go-ego-e.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Montamonta.com 17/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.