SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Agroptima

Other Farm management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Agroptima does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Agroptima on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Agroptima has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Agroptima does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Agroptima does notAgroptima publishes, and they do not
Farmbritefarmbrite.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Agworldagworld.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Datamarsdatamars.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Davis Instrumentsdavisinstruments.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Climate Fieldviewclimate.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Arablearable.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Corviancorvian.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Lelylely.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Nedap Livestocknedap-livestockmanagement.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Landdatalanddata.de 14/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
365Farmnet365farmnet.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Agriviagrivi.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.