SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to AMTS Feeds Manager

Other Farm management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that AMTS Feeds Manager does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from AMTS Feeds Manager on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

AMTS Feeds Manager has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and AMTS Feeds Manager does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and AMTS Feeds Manager does notAMTS Feeds Manager publishes, and they do not
Farmbritefarmbrite.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Davis Instrumentsdavisinstruments.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Lelylely.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
GEA Farmgea.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Arablearable.com 17/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Corviancorvian.com 17/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Nedap Livestocknedap-livestockmanagement.com 17/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Landdatalanddata.de 14/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
365Farmnet365farmnet.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Agriviagrivi.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Agworldagworld.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Datamarsdatamars.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.